<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God on Huck&#8217;s side?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ULC</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-23064</link>
		<dc:creator>ULC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-23064</guid>
		<description>LOL! I wonder about people like these sometimes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL! I wonder about people like these sometimes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-13741</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-13741</guid>
		<description>If God's truly on his side, then it would be the best thing for this government and the world.  If God wants Huckabee, I want Huckabee.  It's a no-brainer.  Why would having a leader that God wants be a bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If God&#8217;s truly on his side, then it would be the best thing for this government and the world.  If God wants Huckabee, I want Huckabee.  It&#8217;s a no-brainer.  Why would having a leader that God wants be a bad thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insignificant thoughts &#187; Information Salad Episode 68 - The Dead Microphone Edition</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-13248</link>
		<dc:creator>insignificant thoughts &#187; Information Salad Episode 68 - The Dead Microphone Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-13248</guid>
		<description>[...] Huckabee invokes God. What&#8217;s wrong with that? He&#8217;s doing something right, he&#8217;s up in the polls in Iowa. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Huckabee invokes God. What&#8217;s wrong with that? He&#8217;s doing something right, he&#8217;s up in the polls in Iowa. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Information Salad #68: The dead microphone edition. : ISPN Media</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12990</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Salad #68: The dead microphone edition. : ISPN Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12990</guid>
		<description>[...] Huckabee invokes God. What&#8217;s wrong with that? He&#8217;s doing something right, he&#8217;s up in the polls in Iowa. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Huckabee invokes God. What&#8217;s wrong with that? He&#8217;s doing something right, he&#8217;s up in the polls in Iowa. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12874</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12874</guid>
		<description>Scary.

I guess you would have to travel to Iran to hear a politician outside the US use similar rethorics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scary.</p>
<p>I guess you would have to travel to Iran to hear a politician outside the US use similar rethorics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Davison</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12770</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12770</guid>
		<description>I guess OMG would be inappropriate here. Wow. Just what we need. Another president who is convinced that he's divinely led. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess OMG would be inappropriate here. Wow. Just what we need. Another president who is convinced that he&#8217;s divinely led. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reads of the day &#171; The Big Deal</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>Reads of the day &#171; The Big Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>[...] PrezVid - God on Huckabee&#8217;s side [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PrezVid - God on Huckabee&#8217;s side [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12741</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/12/05/god-on-hucks-side/#comment-12741</guid>
		<description>Are you rejecting this notion because it's incredible or because it's false. Many things are both incredible and true (cellphones, satellites, nuclear power) but would have been rejected as ludicrous predictions hundreds of years ago. So the real question shouldn't be "are Huckabee's claims incredible?" (because they are), but "are Huckabee's claims true?" (and on what do you base your claim?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you rejecting this notion because it&#8217;s incredible or because it&#8217;s false. Many things are both incredible and true (cellphones, satellites, nuclear power) but would have been rejected as ludicrous predictions hundreds of years ago. So the real question shouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;are Huckabee&#8217;s claims incredible?&#8221; (because they are), but &#8220;are Huckabee&#8217;s claims true?&#8221; (and on what do you base your claim?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
