<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rushed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3370</guid>
		<description>Rush calling the YouTubers a bunch of "dingbats" is like the crack whore calling a meth slut a junkie.  Rush is the King of Dingbats.  Not to mention a junkie whore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush calling the YouTubers a bunch of &#8220;dingbats&#8221; is like the crack whore calling a meth slut a junkie.  Rush is the King of Dingbats.  Not to mention a junkie whore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>I don't see how trying to peak interest in a larger set of demographics, that is to say to encourage democracy, is inherently pro-democrat; it isn't, it's pro-democracy.  It is of extreme importance in every society to encourage civic interest and responsibility in the youth.  It seems to me quite reprehensible and irresponsible to say "The youth tend to vote more liberal than I prefer, therefore I discourage any attempt to increase their voter turnout."  I can't believe that anyone interested in a representative government would oppose such initiatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how trying to peak interest in a larger set of demographics, that is to say to encourage democracy, is inherently pro-democrat; it isn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s pro-democracy.  It is of extreme importance in every society to encourage civic interest and responsibility in the youth.  It seems to me quite reprehensible and irresponsible to say &#8220;The youth tend to vote more liberal than I prefer, therefore I discourage any attempt to increase their voter turnout.&#8221;  I can&#8217;t believe that anyone interested in a representative government would oppose such initiatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brave Sir Rudy Ran Away! &#124; Peach Pundit</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>Brave Sir Rudy Ran Away! &#124; Peach Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>[...] their attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line — as we see from Rush and others — is that YouTube is somehow biased. That’s absurd. That would be like the Democrats [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line — as we see from Rush and others — is that YouTube is somehow biased. That’s absurd. That would be like the Democrats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP&#8217;s big internet mistake</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP&#8217;s big internet mistake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>[...] attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line &#8212; as we see from Rush and others &#8212; is that YouTube is somehow biased. That&#8217;s absurd. That would be like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line &#8212; as we see from Rush and others &#8212; is that YouTube is somehow biased. That&#8217;s absurd. That would be like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GOP&#8217;s gigantic internet mistake at PrezVid</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP&#8217;s gigantic internet mistake at PrezVid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>[...] attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line &#8212; as we see from Rush and others &#8212; is that YouTube is somehow biased. That&#8217;s absurd. That would be like the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempt to fink out on the YouTube/CNN Republican debate. The party line &#8212; as we see from Rush and others &#8212; is that YouTube is somehow biased. That&#8217;s absurd. That would be like the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rushed</title>
		<link>http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rushed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prezvid.com/2007/07/26/rushed/#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, gawd, Buzzmachine got mentioned on Rush, by Rush. Details at Prezvid.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, gawd, Buzzmachine got mentioned on Rush, by Rush. Details at Prezvid.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
